Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Texas at Arlington/Discourse Markers (Fall 2018)

Pragmatic meaning, focusing on the

meaning, distribution, and functions of discourse markers, including their interaction with

deixis, implicature, presupposition, and speech acts.

Week 8
Welcome to your Wikipedia assignment's course timeline. This page guides you through the steps you'll need to complete for your Wikipedia assignment, with links to training modules and your classmates' work spaces.

Your course has been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. You can reach them through the Get Help button at the top of this page.

Resources - Please read through these two documents on the goals of Wikipedia editing. You can click on each one and save them as a PDF on your own computer:


 * Editing Wikipedia, pages 1–5
 * Evaluating Wikipedia

There are two short steps needed for this week:

a) Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (Because of Wikipedia's technical restraints, you may receive a message that you cannot create an account. To resolve this, please try again off campus or the next day.)

b) Complete the two training modules through the links above. Do them while logged in through the course page, so I can see when you have completed them.

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Exercise
There are two tasks to try out this week:

a) Complete the two training modules above.

b) Then,

--Follow the &quot;Evaluating an Article training (linked below).

=
 --Create a section in your sandbox titled &quot;Article evaluation,&quot; where you'll leave notes about your observations and what you've learned. ======

=


--Choose an existing article on Wikipedia to read and evaluate from the set of articles related to pragmatics that will be sent as an announcment in Blackboard. For your evaluation, don’t just answer  “yes” or “no to the questions,” but write out details that illustrate your observations. (Answer as many as apply to your article, but don't feel limited to these--you can include other observations, too!):

 ======


 * Give the name of the article that you are evaluating.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 *  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 *  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Evaluate an article

Thinking about sources and plagiarism

Week 10
Choose your topic / Find your sourcesFor this week, there are two tasks:

a) Choose an article for your group to improve from the list that your instructor will supply (for HW 5).

b) Depending on whether you chose a topic or a biography, download the guideline document below, and save the PDF on your computer, and read it.

Biographies

Linguistics

Week 11
For this week, there are two tasks:

a) Complete the two training modules above.

b) Select one person in your group whose sandbox space you'll all use to draft the improvements to your article. Make sure you know how to get to their sandbox.

Resource: Editing Wikipedia, pages 7–9

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 12
Now that you've improved your draft based on others' feedback, it's time to move your group's revised sections live - to the &quot;mainspace&quot; of the Wikipedia article. (You can continue to edit it once your changes are moved to the mainspace.)

Resource: Editing Wikipedia, page 13

Exercise
Add links to your article

Now's the time to revisit your text and refine your work. You may want to do more research to find missing information; you might rewrite the lead section to represent all major points; think abou whether you need to reorganize the text to communicate the information better, and if so, should there be additional section headings; if you want to add add images and other media, see the trainining module above.

Continue to expand and improve your work, and format your article to match Wikipedia's tone and standards. Remember to contact your Wikipedia Expert at any time if you need further help!

Week 13
It's the final week to develop your article. There are two parts that make up HW 5:

a) Everyone (auditors and enrolled students) should contribute to the improved article that your group is working on. (See Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.)

b) Enrolled students should also submit a reflective essay on the editing process, via Blackboard.  (See the trainining module below for some guiding questions that the essay can address.)


 * Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Guiding questions

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.