Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-30/Arbitration report

The Arbitration Committee opened two cases this week, and closed no cases.

New cases

 * Piotrus: A case involving administrator and other editors on Eastern Europe related articles. Multiple parties accuse others of edit warring, incivility, and biased editing. (An earlier arbitration case, Piotrus-Ghirla, was suspended due to inactivity on the part of, who is a party in the new case.)


 * TingMing: A case involving the actions of .  alleges that he has engaged in "controversial edits", edit warring, incivility, and possibly sockpuppetry.  TinMing denies the allegations, and alleges incivility on the part of Ideogram.

Evidence phase

 * Paranormal: A case involving the actions of various users, especially as regards WP:NPOV and WP:ATT, on "articles on paranormal and pseudoscientific topics", such as parapsychology and Electronic voice phenomenon.


 * Transnistria: A case involving the actions of and  on Transnistria-related articles.  MariusM alleges that Mauco (who has not made a statement because he is blocked) has engaged in sockpuppetry, edit warring and other misconduct.


 * Tobias Conradi: A case involving the actions of  who, while acknowledged as a productive contributor, has been called incivil on various occasions.


 * Zeq-Zero0000: A case involving the actions of and .  Zero alleges that Zeq has engaged in POV-pushing, while Zeq alleges that Zero has misused administrative tools in blocking him, the case in particular involving the question of whether probations, article bans, etc. can be enforced by involved admins.


 * E104421-Tajik: A case involving the actions of E104421 and Tajik. The case was opened, but a motion to suspend the case pending a referral to Community enforceable mediation has the support of five arbitrators.

Voting phase

 * Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram: A case involving the actions of Certified.Gangsta and Ideogram, both of whom Durova and others allege to have been involved in edit-warring on Taiwan-related articles. Ideogram, who has also been accused of improper behaviour on the community noticeboard, denies the allegations. Certified.Gangsta presented evidence, in which he alleges that Ideogram has engaged in canvassing, wikistalking, and orchestrating an anti-Certified.Gangsta campaign. He also denies Durova's allegiations. Kirill Lokshin has proposed remedies, with the support of five arbitrators, placing both parties on revert parole, and admonishing Ideogram.


 * Betacommand: A case involving the actions of Betacommand. Some of Betacommand's blocks have been questioned, and his bot-related actions have led to his removal from the bot approvals group.  Betacommand has noted that he makes numerous username-related blocks, and that most of his blocks were appropriate.  Whether Betacommand used his administrative account for bot-related activity, whether he is unique in doing so, and whether such an action should be allowed or not, have also been questioned.  Paul August has proposed a remedy, with the support of seven arbitrators, desysopping Betacommand; voting on other remedies is split.


 * Mudaliar-Venki123: A case involving the actions of Mudaliar and Venki123 on a series of articles. Kirill Lokshin has proposed remedies banning both parties for one year, with the support of six arbitrators.


 * Freedom skies: A case involving the actions of Freedom skies.  JFD and others allege that he has edit warred to push his point of view.  He denies the allegations.  A remedy to place Freedom skies on revert parole has the support of five arbitrators.


 * Falun Gong: A case regarding the conduct of various editors on the Falun Gong article. Olaf Stephanos and Asdfg12345 allege that Samuel Luo has edit-warred in removing pro-Falun Gong material from the article, while Luo, Tomananda and others allege that Stephanos, Asdfg and others have edit-warred (including page blanking) in removing anti-Falun Gong material.  A remedy placing Falun Gong on article probation has the support of five arbitrators; a series of other remedies placing various users on revert parole and/or banning them from Falun Gong and related articles and talk pages have been proposed, but voting on them is split.