Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-06-18/Arbitration report

The Arbitration Committee did not accept or close any cases this week.

Evidence phase

 * PalestineRemembered: A case involving the actions of, referred from the Community sanction noticeboard.


 * Miskin: A case involving the actions of, who was controversially blocked by for one month (later reduced to one week) for alleged revert warring.


 * Abu badali: A case alleging that has disruptively tagged non-free images for deletion, even when a valid fair-use justification exists, and has harassed editors who have complained about this behavior. Abu badali denies the allegations.


 * NYScholar: A case involving the actions of a number of users, including and, in relation to the Lewis Libby article.

Voting phase

 * Badlydrawnjeff: A highly controversial case involving the actions of Badlydrawnjeff, Doc glasgow, Tony Sidaway and JzG in relation inter alia to the article known as QZ, which underwent an AfD which was closed as delete by Drini, but overturned on DRV by Xoloz. The resulting AfD was then speedily closed by thebainer.  Badlydrawnjeff then filed for a deletion review, which was speedily closed or removed by a number of administrators and others consecutively, including JzG, Doc Glasgow and Tony Sidaway, and the closures often reverted or new DRVs opened.  There is dispute as to whether the actions of all parties were within process, and whether, as some believe, WP:BLP takes priority over DRV.  A peripheral issue to the case is a 60-hour block of Badlydrawnjeff by Zsinj, apparently after discussions on the admin IRC channel, although some have stated that the consensus on the channel did not favour the block.  The block was quickly undone by Gaillimh.  Additionally, some allege that violetriga acted improperly in undeleting some articles deleted under BLP.  Kirill Lokshin has proposed principles to the effect that the overriding principle with respect to BLPs should be "do no harm", and that suspected violations may be speedy deleted, but that these may be contested through the normal channels, although they must not be restored until consensus has formed to do so, and principles cautioning Violetriga and Night Gyr  to avoid undeleting content deleted under BLP, all of which have the support of FloNight.  A remedy banning Badlydrawnjeff from editing all articles covered by WP:BLP, and any associated discussions, especially deletion discussions, and those relating to the policy itself has not been voted on.


 * Piotrus: A case involving and other editors on Central and Eastern Europe-related articles. Multiple parties accuse others of edit warring, incivility, unethical behavior and biased editing. (An earlier arbitration case, Piotrus-Ghirla, was dismissed without prejudice  in part due to inactivity of, who was listed as a party in the new case.)  An amnesty for past behaviour in editing disputes on articles relating to Eastern Europe has the support of two arbitrators.  Voting on other remedies is split.


 * Paranormal: A case involving the actions of various users, especially as regards bias and attribution, on "articles on paranormal and pseudoscientific topics", such as parapsychology and Electronic voice phenomenon. Proposals placing paranormal-related articles on article probation, limiting editors on them to one revert per week, and cautioning Dradin and Kazuba have the support of two arbitrators; voting on other remedies is split.


 * Hkelkar 2: A case involving the actions of, , and , Rama's Arrow alleges that the others acted as meatpuppets of banned user Hkelkar, and blocked them for six months.  They deny the allegations, and allege that Rama's Arrow acted improperly in blocking them, and in posting private e-mails to the incidents noticeboard.  Various remedies have been proposed including an early proposal to impose no sanctions on any of the parties but calling on the parties to enter into mediation, based on a finding of fact noting a lack of reliable evidence in the case, and a proposal to prohibit administrator actions between the parties has the support of six arbitrators. Voting on a recent proposal to desysop Rama's Arrow is split at three-to-two.  Voting on principles regarding the posting of private e-mails is split but it appears that a majority of arbitrators will support the principle that private e-mails may not be posted on-wiki without the consent of the sender.


 * E104421-Tajik: A case involving the actions of E104421 and Tajik. The case had been suspended to allow a referral to Community enforceable mediation, but the mediation broke down after Tajik was alleged to have edited through sockpuppets while claiming to be away and unavailable for the mediation. Remedies have been proposed banning Tajik either indefinitely or for one year (which have the support of six arbitrators), and reminding AzaToth that Wikipedia operates by consensus (with the support of three arbitrators).

Motion to close

 * TingMing: A case involving the actions of .  alleges that he has engaged in "controversial edits", edit warring, incivility, and possibly sockpuppetry.  TingMing denies the allegations, and alleges incivility on the part of Ideogram.  Kirill Lokshin has proposed a remedy banning TingMing for one year, which has the support of eight arbitrators.  However, a motion to close the case "as moot" has the support of three arbitrators.


 * Transnistria: A case involving the actions of and  on Transnistria-related articles.  MariusM alleges that Mauco (who has not made a statement because he is blocked) has engaged in sockpuppetry, edit warring and other misconduct.  If closed,,  and  would be indefinitely banned from any editing related to Transnistria.  However, Jdforrester has opposed the motion to close, calling for remedies against MariusM.

Under review

 * Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram: A review of the Certified.Gangsta-Ideogram case. Ideogram and Sean William allege that Certified.Gangsta has engaged in tendentious editing since the main case.