Wikipedia talk:About the sandbox/Use of sandbox talk

'''The following discussion items are moved from WT:SB and relate to the use of that page as a place for discussing the sandbox. They are probably no longer relevant, but are archived here.'''

Consensus?
Was the move to make this a discussion page discussed somewhere, such as village pump? It's a great idea, but a serious move like this should probably be discussed before it is implimented. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 20:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, fair point, I must admit it didn't really occur to me that it might be at all controversial. It just seemed sort of "obvious" to me that that should be its purpose, and that test edits here were just a newcomer error (a perfectly understandable one, but nonetheless an error).  But seeing as you raise the issue, sure I'll take it to VP.  &mdash; Alan✉ 21:17, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Now raised at Village_pump_(miscellaneous) (diff). &mdash; Alan✉ 21:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Discussion sandbox
Can a sandbox be created to test post to a discussion page - as the discussion page has the 'new section' feature that normal pages do not have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.206.162.75 (talk) 09:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

It's a sandbox - use it for whatever you want.--Dark Green (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC)