Wikipedia talk:Abuse response/203.26.122.12

I suspect that Hoverfish has fabricated the link between Brendan123 and the IP address in question. He has not presented the evidence when asked twice in the Meher Baba discussion page and he simply wants to archive the whole thing now.

Why he did this I dont know but he has been asked to be civil previously and his reverts have been questioned and also his uniclusive editing style.

As for Johnathon he only posted in the discussion after reading the sly allegation by Hoverfish that I was Brendan123, which is a lie. Johnathon dose not get involved in Wikipedia after the 2006 straw poll in which his new account was called a sockpuppet, by Hoverfish because once again he was defending the article as if he owned it.. Johnaton did use the same work computer I was on at the time but his motive was to counter what was a sly and uncivil allegation by Hoverfish. He has assured me he will avoid wikipedia as he finds edit bullies boring.

As for me I am only going to post from home now as to avoid the sneaky tactic some editors use of discrediting a new deitor to block new content and by claiming abuse and sock puppetry. Im sure sock puppets are the plague of wikipedia but equally editors who act like an article is their own are just as bad. Worse because their abuse hides behind a veil of respect. Hypocrisy in short--Jones.liam (talk) 00:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)