Wikipedia talk:Administrator review/Acalamari

First of all, this note is not asking for any favor. As a senior scientist, I thought I should convey my views for progress of Wikipedia and reliability of Wikipedia to readers.

Yesterday On 30 October 2011 I have found one incorrect sentence on "Gamma rays" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray under the paragraph Radioactive decay (gamma decay): It can then move to a lower energy state by emitting a gamma ray, in much the same way that an atomic electron can jump to a lower energy state by emitting infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light. In this the incorrect statement is "in much the same way that an atomic electron can jump to a lower energy state by emitting infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light".

I never came across a phenomenon stating an atomic electron jump to a lower energy state by emitting infrared, visible, or ultraviolet light. As a scientist, I wish to know the source of this information from the writer of this article.

Replacing this sentence with the latest Physics was rejected immediately, based on the policy "Please do not write an article about yourself".: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.a.Padmanabha_Rao&diff=cur

Yes, I agree it is my research work. Every journal accepts our own research work. Why not Wikipedia, if the author projects correct facts?

I have no problem if Wikipedia continues to project incorrect physics. The matter is whether Wikipedia genuinely interested in correctness in information, and ready to listen and consider what some senior scientists say,but not for asking any change in Wikipedia's policies.

M.A.Padmanabha Rao, PhD (AIIMS) Former Professor of Medical Physics 114 Charak Sadan, Vikas Puri, New Delhi 110018, India raomap@yahoo.com