Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/2008 IWF action/UK ISPs' Transparent Proxies

3 Mobile proxy
editprotected 3 Mobile uses this proxy: 217.171.129.70 (yesterday it was not censored from my phone but it is today, at least they are showing a "Site blocked" template rather than just some error message). TH (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * When this page is next edited, please sort the rows numerically. Thank you.Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Just to get this clear, a website can be censored without using a (visible) proxy. So when IPs are added, it needs to be sure that MULTIPLE users are sharing the same IP address. --Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 12:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Doing a quick Google search indicates to me that 3 Mobile users are always behind a proxy, because their traffic is NAT'ed. There are several reports of SPAM bots and stuff behind those NAT address, so I don't think this IP should be added at this time. --Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 12:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Mmm, I added the row per the edit request, should I remove it? -- lucasbfr  talk 12:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think you should. This proxy is no different compared to the situation before this mess. It's just that these users are now, next to this, also not able to view one single page. But this template is not a list of ISPs that censor the image. Although I think we should create such a list. --Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 14:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Also - my 3 mobile 3G connection does not currently block the content. Mobile internet providers usually filter sites for users not confirmed to be over 18 anyway, this could be that block and not the IWF list. P retzels Talk! 14:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- lucasbfr  talk 09:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

BT Total Broadband
editprotected The entry for BT Total Broadband (194.72.9.25) isn't correct - this is also affecting people that have other BT connections ("corporate" connections and the such like). I'm not on BT Total Broadband, but my provider uses the BT network to get out onto the Internet. Could the entry be updated to reflect this? [ジャム] [talk] 23:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- lucasbfr  talk 13:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Cheers :).  [ジャム] [talk] 18:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Be Unlimited
My IP is not the one Wikipedia sees: this is a new proxy not on your list. --89.167.221.2 (talk) 15:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

editprotected

Add to list. D.M.N. (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

The XFF status of this IP is: Yes, but not yet whitelisted. --Th e DJ (talk • contribs) 18:22, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- lucasbfr  talk 09:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Need comments and last-updated-as-of
Please add a column "comments & last-updated" or something similar so we can track the last time something changed. Leave the entries blank for now. See this edit to Administrators' noticeboard/2008 IWF action for a similar table. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  01:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * This edit is to a different table. Ruslik (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know. I trust the administrators who watchlist this to be able to figure out what I'm asking.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  18:56, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In all honesty, I have no idea what you need. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I meant I want this template to have a space to put the last-updated information, much like the one this edit I added on Administrators' noticeboard/2008 IWF action. I was surprised that Ruslik said "this edit is to a different table," of course it is to a different table, as I cannot edit this protected template.  I trust the administrators to be able to look at the before-and-after of my edit and apply a similar change to the table in this template. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  00:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)