Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests

Addition of parties to a clarification request by someone other than the person who opened that clarification request
I noted in the Noleander discussion that this edit appears to be non-standard. Is this something that is OK, or should this be reverted by a clerk? — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 16:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I think it's not OK and have added instructions to the template to make clear it shouldn't be done in the future. There's been some private discussion about what to do in this instance. Barkeep49 (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * If this sort of thing is not OK, and this has been clarified going forward, should I just undo the edit? — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 21:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The brief discussion arrived at just leaving it there in this instance, mainly given that the notifications were already sent and that one could have reasonably thought that others could add involved editors. SilverLocust 💬 22:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2024
Remove the template from the page, since this shortcut is already linked from the shortcut template in WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header. 88.97.195.160 (talk) 23:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 88.97.195.160 (talk) 23:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ Barkeep49 (talk) 23:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)