Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asgardian/Workshop

Question
I assume I'm an "other party," but I'm not really sure. If so, should I add comments to Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asgardian/Workshop? I see areas like "Past dispute resolution" and "Belittling editors" -- are these the places where we can place "Proposed findings of fact ... supported by evidence on the evidence page," as per Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. Thanks for helping me understand the guidelines; I'd hate to inadvertently complicate the page. -- Tenebrae (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * When BOZ proposed I start posting on the Workshop page, I asked the same question, he replied thus. Nightscream (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, I concur - if you want to make proposals of your own (and if you have any you wish to make, I encourage you to do so), my advice works for you as well. You may also post in the "Comment by parties" section for any item that myself and/or Nightscream has posted thus far. BOZ (talk) 01:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with above. I am currently reviewing the evidence and plan on posting to the workshop towards the end of this week. KnightLago (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Still working. I am going through a lot of old differences, which has proved very time consuming. I hope to have something up ASAP. KnightLago (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It's OK - there is a lot to look at. :) BOZ (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Ditto. I provided a lot of those diffs, so I can wait. Nightscream (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I have recruited to help comb through everything and try and wrap this up ASAP. The delay remains due to the volume of evidence, not the nature of the decision. KnightLago (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Your dilligence is appreciated! BOZ (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)