Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Workshop

Noting, for the record:
[Note: I am placing this here as well, at the suggestion of Tgeairn, so it doesn't get lost.]

My only participation in this case will be the statement and brief comments I initially left, which are now copied above. I have no desire to be further involved, and will only consider providing further evidence if Astynax is sanctioned in any way. As a previously uninvolved editor, my view is that Astynax has tried valiantly to move this article to a NPOV, though he's been stymied at every turn. Any attempt to sanction him for his work on this article will force me to participate in this case, which I have no interest in doing otherwise. LHMask me a question 00:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Analysis posted by Tgeairn
I believe Tgeairn may have misposted his "analysis" of my evidence here mistakenly. I believe his response to me should have been placed on the Evidence page rather than here. If this is indeed the place for such further allegations, then will a clerk or arb please respond so that know to answer his representations here. &bull; Astynax talk 07:56, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Accidental revert
Please note that was in error (scrolling page history on a touchscreen device), and I immediately undid my revert. I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience. Thank you --Tgeairn (talk) 08:28, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Behaviour in this case
"You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being unnecessarily rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all)."

Astynax has added significant accusations (including advocacy, editor harassment, "persistent IDHT behavior", threatening editors, and synthesis) to the workshop page, without any of this being supported by evidence presented during the evidence phase.

These additions were made after the workshop phase deadline had passed and, taken along with their doubling of the allowed word limit during the evidence phase, demonstrate a lack of decorum and further illustrate the need for some form of sanction. Tgeairn (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)


 * All comments made by me on the Workshop page were made prior to the end of the 6 November target closing date local (PST) time. &bull; Astynax talk 10:36, 7 November 2014 (UTC)