Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lapsed Pacifist 2/Evidence

Proceeding from here
I'm not sure this RFA is the best vehicle for moving this forward; other editors involved have tendentious histories, but I haven't been invited to comment on their RFAs. I'd like to rebut much of what has been written about me, but I'm not sure the format here lends itself to that. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * First off this is an arbitration case, and as such the other editors you are referring to do not have one open about them for you to comment at. Each case is opened only after receiving acceptance from Wikipedia's Arbitrators. You may want to read over Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. As for a rebuttle, you were of course welcome to have made a opening statement while the case was being voted on, but you chose not to. You can now have a few options on how to comment / provide a rebuttal. You can start a section here, on the /workshop page (this is for an analysis of evidence provided by another user). Or you can make a statement on the cases talk page. Both places are watched by the Arbitrators. Cheers, Tiptoety  talk 16:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring and reverting during case
I've noticed that several of the parties to this case are continuing to edit war and revert on articles even after the case has opened. It has been proposed that one of the parties have an injunction made to topic ban them from said articles during the case (see here), but I'm thinking that all editors need to back away from the articles and present evidence at the case instead. Otherwise you will all end up topic banned at the end of the case, or worse. The history of the StatoilHydro article is particularly unimpressive. Carcharoth (talk) 01:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please discuss here. If the parties seem unaware of this, could a clerk notify them please? Carcharoth (talk) 01:14, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Lapsed Pacifist is the only party who has not yet contributed to that discussion, so I've issued him with a courtesy notification. AGK 10:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

...and from here.
I had expected my rebuttal of Steve's evidence would have prompted a reply from him, or that the arbitrators would weigh in. Are the arbitrators happy with how things are proceeding? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

One of the reasons I ask is that it is likely I will not have a lot of free time over the next few weeks, and I've heard there may be a time limit on this arbitration. Please reply. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 12:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Please. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 14:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm looking at the evidence now and will make comments on the Workshop page about the evidence and the proposals on Sept. 19th (about 18 hours from now.) FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 21:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Change of case clerk
I will be taking over this case from Tiptoety with immediate effect. Please direct any queries to me instead of him if you have any issues arising from the case. Thanks. - Mailer Diablo 20:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)