Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/The Rambling Man/Workshop

.

Clerk Note: Workshop close date
This is just a quick notification that the Arbs have asked us to keep the workshop open for now, even though we're past the originally planned close date. The fact that it is still open is not an error or omission on our part. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC).
 * Dear Lankiveil. Do you have any clue about how long this "for now" is planed to last by the Arbs ? One week, one month, just before the elections (of the new ArbCom, of course) or what else ? In any case, thanks for telling. Pldx1 (talk) 11:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Not past the posting of the PD - I'd have thought that was obvious. I think that Workshops should stay open until we post the PD unless there are other factors in play, eg serious disruption. Doug Weller  talk 15:41, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Change the Proposed Decision date?
I seem to have posted a lot, so I believe that more evaluation is needed before ArbCom decides to open the Proposed Decision phase and then close the Workshop. Extend the date to several days later? --George Ho (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * As I said before, I don't intend to extend this case beyond its initial schedule. I am not concerned that myself or the other people helping to draft this case will not have time to review your proposals, and arbitrators may take as much time as they wish after the PD is posted to review the evidence and workshops before voting, or add new proposals to the PD. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeed, I don't see any reason to extend the PD beyond it's scheduled due date. --kelapstick(bainuu) 01:43, 1 October 2016 (UTC)