Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Ban Appeals Subcommittee/Archives/2016

User:Brayden96 unblocked
Following a successful appeal, User:Brayden96 has been unblocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've raised issues with this unblock at GorrillaWarfare's talk page before noticing this; I'm not sure this page is watched at all but I'm fine with discussion taking place wherever best suited; GW can move my talk page messages here is she wishes. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  07:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I have a different concern, that being that BASC doesn't exist anymore, so....yea, what? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * FYI, we are almost at the end of the remaining BASC appeals. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)