Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Candidate statements/Danny/Questions for the candidate

Discussion moved from questions page
Don't you agree this page is useful for other users, to see and evaluate the questions that you're being asked (and going to ignore per your Candidate statement)? I do. — Dorftrottel⁠ 15:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I for one find it an interesting choice, and I will follow the reaction to it with interest. However, I do think that it does limit the voter's ability to evaluate your ability as an Arbitrator, particularly when a primary basis for them to perform such evaluations is through said questions. Perhaps Danny would be willing to answer a few questions on his talk page? Anthøny  21:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, he closes his statement with "I will not be answering any further questions". — Dorftrottel⁠ 02:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If it helps, I certainly think he's given the community all the information it needs. Alai 05:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * At this point, if you don't know who Danny is, and you don't know his viewpoints/past history, you should probably do your own research. He's certainly qualified for the position., having, you know, been a foundation employee, and nearly being elected to the board. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  06:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Not to mention the office actions he once took against a current board member, in what could arguably be described as a "bad call", some argue. — Dorftrottel⁠ 11:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, he's already got my support. User:Veesicle 11:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that goes to support my point above... Alai 16:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)