Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2007/Vote/MastCell

Why I'm opposing
My experience with MastCell’s contributions, while limited, have led me to believe he is not a good candidate for arbcom. In a nutshell, MastCell blocked a user with whom he had a previous dispute  and whom he had tangled in an arbcom decision  in which MastCell was heavily involved, posted a query as to the questionable block  on AN/I, received one brief, tepid post  of support from an uninvolved editor (after waiting just a few hours), then blocked the editor while the editor was away from Wikipedia. When objections were lodged ,,, MastCell not only refused to consider that he might have done something wrong, but went on the attack against the editors objecting, suggesting that criticism of his admin action constituted a violation of WP:NPA and WP:BATTLE.

Given the above, there are just too many question marks to allow me to vote yes. IronDuke 00:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Needless to say I strongly disagree with this formulation of events, but I've said everything I have to say about this particular episode at the relevant AN/I thread, in particular here. MastCell Talk 07:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)