Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/White Cat

Discussion

 * You know you'll never be elected in a billion years, so why bother? Moreschi (talk) 20:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That is a question answered in my statement. I suggest you actually read it (Q1 & Q2). You may also want to read Q7. -- Cat chi? 04:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's for the comic relief. White Cat on arbcom - it makes you laugh. Eusebeus (talk) 17:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The only comic relief here is the quality of your post. :) -- Cat chi? 22:18, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Find a way to be outside of wikipedia.
I mean to ask every candidate the most difficult question I can think of for them. That's all I can think of to demand of you, and I think it counts as an endorsement.00:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.170.70 (talk)
 * I am not sure I understand what the intended question here is about. -- Cat chi? 15:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Edit Analysis
A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Wikipedia spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Comment by Nihonjoe
...per tendency to be involved as an involved party in cases.

Sorry but either something went wrong when that comment was posted or the logic is simply escaping my eyes. Can you elaborate on how we should interpret this? EconomicsGuy (talk) 07:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)