Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2008/Vote/Wizardman

Should there be a countdown timer before a supplicant is denied access to their talk page for abusing the committee?
23:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.234.170.70 (talk)

Edit Analysis
A detailed breakdown of this candidate's edits in article and Wikipedia spaces can be found here. Franamax (talk) 02:23, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments
LessHeard vanU As I do not believe in a system where my support may be rendered ineffective by the considerations of Jimbo and the existing ArbCom I shall only be supporting Risker; however, had my vote potential been not been constrained by the apparatus employed I would have supported this candidate. LessHeard vanU (talk) 01:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Moral support
I can not vote in arb election. I not have enough edits, but if I could I'd vote for you.  — JoJo • Talk  • 22:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Congrats!
Wizardman, I devote very little attention to procedural matters around here -- which for the most part, I think, is how I stay sane and keep producing articles. But once in a while, I really regret not keeping up better on things, remembering dates of elections, and so forth.

I have been very pleased with all my interactions with you, and consider you one of the more impressive Wikipedians I've come to know. I would have been proud to voice my support for your candidacy, and regret missing the opportunity.

Thank you for your service, and best of luck! Hope it doesn't keep you so busy that you can't work on a GA now and again :) -Pete (talk) 06:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)