Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Comments/Unomi

Discussion of Ravenswing's comment
Thank you for your comment, you are right, I have very few mainspace edits to my name. I have so far mainly involved myself in improving articles which are considered controversial, as such the majority of the editing work is done through consensus building on talkpages and as such I do not aim for accruing mainspace edits. This approach has however given me experience regarding dispute resolution and policy. If anything that I have as many mainspace edits as I do reflects my early inexperience with working in those areas. Unomi (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I opposed as well. 127 mainspace edits isn't even enough to vote in the election, nevermind run. -DJSasso (talk) 04:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Discussion of Keepcalmandcarryon's comment
I sincerely hope that readers will take the time to read the information kindly provided by Kcaco. Unomi (talk) 12:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Note: I have moved the above discussions from the comment page. Please restrict posts there to a single brief comment on the candidate or explanation of your vote. Skomorokh 16:34, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit Analysis
A detailed analysis of this candidate's edits in article, user and project space can be found at User:Franamax/Ucontribs-2009/Unomi. Franamax (talk) 07:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)