Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2012/Candidates/Beeblebrox

Beeblebrox

 * Oppose – An arbitrator should have a disposition to help settle down arguments into workable consensus. B's edits like this and this do the opposite, by telling 60 editors who came to a workable consensus that he thinks they're wasting his time, while ignoring the one real trouble maker who is challenging the consensus at many venues and stirring up trouble.  Whatever the underlying dispute is, and no matter how disinterested a person is, this kind of response can only make things worse.  Dicklyon (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * "This kind of response can only make thongs worse" is exactly how I feel about having my remarks summarily removed from a discussion and labeled as vandalism by someone who apparently does not know nor care to find out how Wikipedia defines vandalism. You do realize this election has been ongoing for two weeks and ends in a few hours, and that nearly 800 users have already voted, right? Thanks for dropping by though. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Questions
Questions for Beeblebrox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk • contribs) 10:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)