Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2012/Candidates/Ks0stm

Insufficient maturity to be an Arb
While User:Joefromrandb clearly violated the No Personal Attacks rule, Ks0stm inserting himself into verbal fisticuffs on that irate user's talk page HERE was an ill-considered provocation that turned bad to worse and shows a clear lack of the type of mature judgment that we need in ArbCom members. That the escalation was followed by running to mommy at AN/I is even worse. I strongly oppose this candidacy. Carrite (talk) 17:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Strongly Agree - Ks0stm could have been way more mature there and nicely settled the issues. I strongly oppose Ks0stm for Arb. Vacation nine 21:04, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Strongly Agree - Awful. (How the H did an editor like this pass RfA?? Is there something dastardly the matter with that process?? And I know it isn't limited to this Admin by any means. Some that got thru with no negative !votes are purely awful. How the F does that happen??) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Questions
Questions for Ks0stm

Kiefer .Wolfowitz  10:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Lack of response
I asked all candidates the same question on 27 November. Ks0stm is the only candidate not to have responded yet. It's been a week. IMO, anyone who cannot be bothered to reply to a simple question is unlikely to contribute much to ArbCom. It's an Oppose from me. Bazonka (talk) 23:01, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Included in the questions subheading by me. Kiefer  .Wolfowitz  10:38, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Bazonka, I'm planning to power through all the questions I've currently got unanswered tomorrow...I've been rather busy for the last week dealing with end of semester studying and tests. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 10:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK. Obviously some level of commitment is required to be an admin, so I hope your academic duties won't cause too many interruptions if and when you become an arb. Bazonka (talk) 22:21, 6 December 2012 (UTC)