Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2013/Candidates/Arthur Rubin/Questions

Clarification on Arthur Rubin's answer regarding Killer Chihuahua
Here, Arthur Rubin does a few things. He calls my questions "obviously an attempt at disruption", and he says:"...I don't see how that edit can rationally be seen as calling her a bitch..."So Arthur is calling my interpretation of his edits irrational. Can anyone explain to me what Arthur Rubin thinks he was doing if he wasn't calling Killer Chihuahua a bitch? Because I'm genuinely flummuxed by Arthur Rubin's response. I guess that he's saying that he redacted the "bitch" word out, and so he didn't call her a bitch, although his later comment make it clear what word had been redacted, essentially communicating the redacted word to his readers. So incivility seems to be perfectly fine with Arthur Rubin (at least when it is Arthur Rubin who is being uncivil), as long as the incivility is superficially "redacted" out. Of course, if he wasn't calling Killer Chihuahua a bitch, as he claims, then the question arises of what he was doing or attempting to communicate with those comments. &mdash; goethean 16:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)