Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/Candidates/AKS.9955/Questions

Copyright investigation
That log is created automatically and does not mean every article contains copyvio. But you did in fact edit Religious sect although I don't see any obvious copyvio. As I said, the log is automatic, it can't tall what might be copyvio and what isn't. Doug Weller (talk) 13:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello Doug Weller, I noticed just now that Ravidassia_sect was redirected (and not moved) to Ravidassia religion three days after I reverted vandalism on that page. I understand your point and agree with you; however my point was slightly different. Why cover and report hundreds of edits indiscriminately on grounds of copyvio? Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  14:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Contributor copyright investigations explains how it works. Once at least five instances of copyvio by one editor are found, a contributor survey can be initiated. This lists all of the edits by a user, organized so they can be easily investigated and evaluated. That's the only economical way to search through the editor's edits. Doug Weller (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes Sir, I am aware about it. Thanks for pointing that out. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  15:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Questions

 * Hello all, thanks for your time and your questions. As of this hour, I have answered all questions raised. In case I missed something or some of you have any further questions, please feel free to ask. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  15:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

New Questions
Hello everyone, due to our festival Diwali I could not edit much on Wikipedia for past few days and got back yesterday. I noticed that I have more questions (lots of them) and have started answering them. I will try and answer all the question at earliest possible. Apologies for the delay. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. Best,  Ya  sh  !   14:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)