Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/Candidates/Salvidrim!

Expletive
I object to the use of the F word as the first word of this candidate's statement. Yes, NOTCENSORED and all of that, but these elections should be "family friendly" - i.e., I don't want to have to look at that word every time I come onto the list of nominations. I suggest a simple replacement with asterisks.  Rcsprinter123    (post)  14:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Rcsprinter123, you should run. We need more people with power issues here. You would be the candidate Wikipedia deserves even if not the one it wants. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.170.50.11 (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawing
I'm not sure what the exact procedure is -- I've amended my statement and removed myself from the main election page and the Candidate guide. Pinging the EC to let me know if there are any steps I missed:, ,. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello Salvidrim!, as a fellow contestant, I personally feel that you were (are) a good candidate for ArbCom. I am making this statement purely based on your past work and experience level. I wish you all the best. Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  14:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * "At least now I know for sure that the Arbitrators we will elect will do a far better job than I ever could've." - Ah, "could've"? I'll disagree with you there. Thanks for your part in this election cycle all the same, Salvidrim!. Much respect for stepping up and for stepping down. -Thibbs (talk) 03:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Froid

 * I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments and very much appreciate your willingness to step up to the plate, if that were reqired. However, gee whiz, is the profanity necessary? Froid (talk) 11:40 am, Today (UTC−5)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salvidrim! (talk • contribs) 17:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Well said. Scottlovessue (talk) 09:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)