Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates/BU Rob13

Frivolous reports on ANI
Hi, I think I will vote against that particular candidate, as their frivolous report on the ANI has left me a poor impression of their editorial misjudgement. The frivolous report which Rob13 has filled against me on ANI, can be found and read here: User:SilentResident reported by User:BU Rob13 (Result: Protected). It is obvious that the Arbitration Committee should be manned only by people who take the job very seriously and pay attention to things, such as distinguishing real WP:3RRs. For the record, the particular candidate has yet to apologize for this filling against me, which although not obligatory, could be a good sign of responsibility and trustiness that befits those aspiring to become Arbitation Commitee members. I have nothing against Rob, but the filling of frivolous reports and the lack of any apology thereafter, concerning such smaller cases, makes me concerned about whenether the candidate is really suitable for such a great responsibility. Just my opinion based on my poor experience with that candidate. -- ❤ S ILENT R ESIDENT  ❤ 22:57, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * In hindsight (a rather extreme hindsight, as this is from two years ago when I had just joined the site), this should have been taken to WP:RFPP, not AN3. Both parties were edit-warring rather than only one individual, which typically results in protection. I wouldn't personally view that report as "frivolous", given that WP:3RR was most definitely violated, but there was a better location to take it. I apologize if my report gave the impression I was solely placing any wrongdoing on you. I did also note that the administrator responding to the report should deal with the IP range that represented the other side of the edit war. ~ Rob 13 Talk 23:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * hmmm. I wasn't aware that you were new in Wikipedia back then, but in that case, I couldn't bite you. That could be unfair especially since we all were newbies when we came to this project. If you were really young member back then, then consider this matter closed and forgotten. -- ❤ S ILENT R ESIDENT  ❤ 23:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Newbie or not, I do apologize for my part in things. Nowadays, with much more experience, I'd have encouraged both parties to focus on the discussion on the talk page. ~ Rob 13 Talk 23:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I am glad this misunderstanding has been cleared out. I appreciate your positive response, and you have my support for your cadidancy for membership in the ArbCom. Wishing you best luck. -- ❤ S ILENT R ESIDENT  ❤ 10:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)