Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Mailer diablo

It seems a tad unfair to hold the lack of answers against this guy when he hasn't been asked any questions! Can some folks who know more about the intracicies of ArbCom than me ask him something? Until then I'm abstaining.

This user seems straightforward and a decent candidate. I think we ought to be encouraging candidates from outside Europe and N America! --kingboyk 15:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

When was SJ's vote made?
Right now, I see the following:


 * 1) (cur) (last) 00:37, January 23, 2006 Radiant! (history is unsure of itself?)
 * 2) (cur) (last) 00:30, January 23, 2006 CBDunkerson (Looks like it was before the deadline)
 * 3) (cur) (last) 00:08, January 23, 2006 Radiant! (→Oppose - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sj (talk • contribs) (technically too late))
 * 4) (cur) (last) 23:30, January 22, 2006 Sj (→Oppose)
 * 5) (cur) (last) 19:59, January 22, 2006 Alex43223
 * 6) (cur) (last) 18:59, January 22, 2006 Tsavage (→Oppose)

It seems Radiant! sees Sj's edit at 00:30. This may be due to a weird database-slave-lag issue, which has in the past made edits appear to occur in bizarre orders. Radiant!: if this is the case for you, you may see your objection to Sj's vote occuring before the vote in question. If the problem is the database lag, it'll resolve it self in a few hours. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 00:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

History uses local time. Regards, Ben Aveling 07:47, 23 January 2006 (UTC)