Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/+Greythorne the Technomancer (+gthorne)

Searching the web for gthorne fravia orc and hcu prove many sources since the mid-1990s, it is too easy to find references to him all over the net - more likely that the person wanting to delete this article does not wish to check this fact. The sources are not connected, there are simply too many of them around the world - and Fravia (who had postings at the woodman site) and the Old Red Cracker (ORC) are according to those wiki pages actually dead (and cannot possibly be connected since they are not even alive now to contest). Greythorne, Fravia and +ORC are the baseplate for modern reverse engineering. Simply read the articles by Fravia (who spoke at the InfoSec conferences) in his mention of +gthorne and ORC all over the place as well. Take the time. This does not deserve removal.

Simply put: There is no way under the sun that all of the resources I found by a simply google search were self-published, there are way too many and the woodman site is famous as a resource for the now deceased Fravia [famous in Information Security Circles] - the claim is ludicrous.

In the Fravia page, he [Fravia] died in 2009. The woodman site is referenced on the wiki page as the "last known mirror" of fravia's works. It honestly is an amazing source even by itself for references to his partner Greythorne (+gthorne) -- there are probably hundreds of articles in there referencing him in just that site alone. Looking at the woodman site (http://woodmann.com/fravia/index.htm) the top date listed was last updated in March 2001.

Please see that there is an article listed in the references referring to him in 2600 magazine called "Clampdown" - clearly real... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caldwyn (talk • contribs) 20:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Ranndybeers for posting the article about one of my heroes. If you read this, perhaps you or I should post more links to references about him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caldwyn (talk • contribs) 20:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd just like to point out that this is the wrong place to argue for or against an article's retention. Please post relevant comments at Articles for deletion/+Greythorne the Technomancer (+gthorne), to avoid parallel discussions. Cheers. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)