Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/1645 in the Papal States

Tagging...
Tagging Lugnuts, Mangoe and Peterkingiron whose opinions in the discussion seem based on an empty article. Not looking for people to change their votes but it didn't seem fair to criticise an opinion without allowing for a response. I also think it could probably be deleted and the reason doesn't really matter, I suppose, but it would seem to set a bad precedent to suggest deletion was/is on the basis of a lack of entries. Stalwart 111  02:25, 28 March 2014 (UTC)