Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/2017 Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice team

If you accuse me of acting in bad faith, will you not help me improve this nomination?

I know the consensus on this page will be opposed to this move. I also feel that the page's existence violates WP:UNDUE, which is part of WP:NPOV. Should I call an RfC? A PxC? Ask Jimbo? Power~enwiki (talk) 20:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should reflect on the possibility that this is a perfectly fine topic for an article, and that your problem is not with this article, but the mainstream media advancing the notability of its subject. bd2412  T 20:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I note for the record that User:BD2412 is the creator of this article. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I note for the record that I am the creator of nearly 3,000 Wikipedia articles, all across the social and political spectrum. I've been here for twelve years. I know what belongs here by now. bd2412  T 20:42, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * If you know the consensus will be opposed to deletion, you should not have nominated this. 331dot (talk) 21:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The consensus on Talk:2017 Special Counsel for the United States Department of Justice team would be against it, as it is mainly viewed by the authors of that page. I don't know if a more general consensus would be in favor or opposed to this.  Power~enwiki (talk) 21:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

I continue to have no intention of withdrawing this nomination until 7 days have passed, or somebody suggests a more appropriate forum. The talk page is not suitable for my concerns, and I still believe that deletion of the page is the most likely remedy. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * There is no other forum; AfD is the last stop when it comes to the existence of an article on Wikipedia. You are welcome to renominate it after a few months have passed, but in doing so you would be courting a trip to ANI for tendentious/disruptive editing and WP:IDONTLIKEIT arguments. If you want more eyes on the AfD, post completely neutral announcements of the AfD on the talkpages of the WikiProjects that are listed on the article's talkpage banners. Softlavender (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

== Not withdrawing ==

I refuse to "withdraw" this nomination; I still fully support deleting this article and my arguments in favor of deleting it. I don't feel I can state any other case for withdrawing the nomination in a neutral way.

However, now that several editors other than those contributing on the page have commented, I agree that it's unlikely this will be closed with anything other than Keep as a result. Power~enwiki (talk) 17:01, 5 July 2017 (UTC)