Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/99 Percent Declaration

Hello. I am a "newcomer"-please do not "bite" me. :) I apologize ahead of time, if i have misunderstood the representation, that i interpreted, of the purpose of this talk page. With that said, i did read through some of the previous discussions, and the observation, to me, is that most of you are editors, or have vast knowledge of the subject at hand, which clearly, seems to have a multitude of different opinions. I, myself, am not an editor,and this is the first time i have ever contributed anything to Wikipedia. :) From an "outsiders" opinion, each and every one of you is correct,on your "views". No one is wrong. Everyone is also correct in wanting to keep this article pure in form, and actual. Instead of deleting this page, why not continue to let it "evolve"? We are looking at history in the making, whether the views are on " one side of the fence, or the other." The movement is struggling to have clear and "factual" demands, but shouldnt that be part of the article? Concrete facts can be included in the article-for what they are, facts; regardless of what "views" they happen to represent. Wikipedia is one of the few, unfiltered sources that can be looked back upon in the future, unlike the "press", ( no offense meant to anyone )which, can pick and choose their coverage of these protest, but here in Wikipedia, talented people with the gift of journalism, can provide ultimate documentation of history in the making, for the world to absorb a compilation of all angles, public access to find accurate facts, and the truth. This page should stand alone, and continue to evolve, with knowledge from every point of view and opinion, and for future generations to come. With utmost respect to every contributor,     April C.


 * Sounds good April. Welcome to Wikipedia. I would encourage you to get a free account. Technically, you shouldn't be responding here (as the main "project page" is where the discussion is supposed to be in this case). I am pretty sure things will work out for the article. When you sign a post use four tildes ( ~ ). It will automatically fill in you sig and the time.Greg Bard (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2011 (UTC)


 * One problem, though. Wikipedia is not a platform of or in support of social movements, regardless of how popular or unpopular they are; nor it is a news site or a soapboxing platform. –MuZemike 02:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Something strange going on here - why did this turn up on my watch list?  Gandydancer (talk) 21:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)