Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Abraham Jennison

Take a breath
The WP:POINT has been made by a number of editors, I suggest editors should take 5 minutes and re-familiarise themselves with Guide_to_deletion and specifically there is no need to respond with the same assertions again and again with every opinion expressed, please accept that opinion are being expressed in good faith even if they arent the same as yours. A quick look at a combined contribution count of those that have commented so far of over 350,000 on en alone, one would expect that reminders such as this shouldnt have been necessary. Gnangarra 12:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I would expect someone who is an admin to know that there is a huge difference between making a point, and making a WP:POINT. I you have any complaints about the latter, please be more specific, and indicate how the point guideline was violated. If it is not about that guideline, then don't link to it. Fram (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah its reasonable to expect that experienced editors know the difference between making a point and making a WP:POINT, I do and this AFD has indications that WP:POINT is within easy grasp of some editors now, but given the experience of those editors a gentle prod should be enough to make them take a breath. At this stage I choose to be vague rather than linking to each of the unnecessary comments being posted, so as to let the experienced editors practice some self control without embarassment. Gnangarra 14:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Feel free to take the current state of things to WP:ANI with a claim that any WP:POINT violations are being made. It would surprise me if you would get a lot of support for that novel interpretation of the guideline. Fram (talk) 14:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * While I don't find any relevance to WP:POINT yet, there is a lot of discussion in this AFD which is mostly repeating the same points again and again. The very fact that you just mentioned ANI shows the discussion is escalating, which achieves nothing. Staying calm is good advice for all editors here, as wiki does not need angry mastodons rampaging around. Yoenit (talk) 15:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * In fairness to Fram, it appears he or she was responding to the implied threat of ANI linked within "embarassment". Location (talk) 06:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Location. Yes, the ANI link by Gigs was the only reason I mentioned ANI, as I don't think there is anything in this discussion that warrants such escalation. Fram (talk) 10:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I missed that. Yoenit (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem! Fram (talk) 06:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)