Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Albert M. Wolters (second nomination)

All I have to say is: Huh? Xoloz 01:24, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Note that the above comment from me regards the summary closure of this discussion (by Mr. Sidaway) after 30 minutes of active status. Thankfully, this action has been undone. Xoloz 14:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Actually you have your facts wrong. closed it as a speedy delete after 14 minutes, then  closed it again as a speedy keep after another 12 minutes. It was then re-opened after another 22 minutes by. I have not closed this debate; I'm actually rather delighted about it, in a quiet sort of way. While I agree with Snowspinner that it's an obvious keep, I think it's as well that the debate continue so nobody can ever falsely claim that it was not an obvious keep. --Tony Sidaway Talk 15:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Whilst I am quite sorry for the error, it is irrelevant to my point; creating an AfD out-of-process (for the self-admitted reason that one entirely disrespect VfU process) is still disruption... maybe even worse than closing it. Xoloz 15:59, 17 October 2005 (UTC)