Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Alleged U.S. war criminals

The result of the debate was "no consensus." However, from a raw count of keep/delete, the deletes won by five votes. I think the one making the final decision should have make a less milquetoast decision. Instead, it's a punt. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BenWilson (talk • contribs) 16:24, 8 March 2005 (UTC).


 * The votes for deletion page doesn't work on simple majority. I count 19 delete votes, 15 keep votes, and a handful of merge votes (which are not delete votes). In no way is there consensus to delete this article. Rhobite 21:36, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)


 * This is nonsense. This article is inherently POV and unencyclopediac -- no VFD can change that. Is there a way to reopen the voting? J. Parker Stone 09:06, 8 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Not this one. A new VfD, though, yes, providing enough time has passed since the last one. El_C 09:46, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * oh ok, thanks for clearing it up. J. Parker Stone 09:47, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. El_C 09:53, 8 August 2005 (UTC)