Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Amadu Sulley

Notability issue and recommendation for speedy keep
The article is about Amadu Sulley a Ghanaian. Amadu Sulley meets Wikipedia's notability requirement per statute of position held and circumstances surrounding his removal from office in his home country, Ghana. Ghana is a country whose citizens are just discovering the importance of Wikipedia. Thus the removal of this entry does not augur well for Wikipedia's policy of inclusiveness. Furthermore the article is a Ghanaian stub and will thus be expanded in time and hence must be protected. I will take it upon myself to work and improve on this article and hence remind for "keep" this article. Ataavi (talk) 14:37, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Position against DCG argument and for speedy keep
You have presented your argument for recommendation for delete in what i characterised to be in two phases 1.position not intrinsically notable. This notion you have put forth is false for the part of the world Amadu Sulley comes from wich is Africa.Elections has the tendency of causing conflicts in African countries and therefore for Africans in the absence of very strong electoral institution and machinery whoever is in charge is keenly watched because of the widely believe such persons can affect the turn of results. Within the modern Ghanaian electoral system which may differ fro m your country.There is electoral chairperson who is aided by two deputies. All this persons are of high standing and are easily recognised by their names in reportage and press releases and are collectively the face of the electoral body in Ghana. 2.Argument on minor routine news coverage and one event indictment. This argument is baseless.And would have been seen to be so,if DCG had taken his time to input the name into Google Search  Engine. Even in the reference side you will find that the are varied and do not all make mention of this indictment before the proposed further google search.Sometimes you should take the initiative to go further. There are so many reputable Ghanaians without Wikipedia pages as compared to the outside world and what may take for this pages to be created is the death or a scandal of that personality.This is only a step in a good direction where stubs are created to be later expanded. And stubs should be protected and integrated well enough into Wikipedia space Ataavi (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)