Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Anila Ali

Clean up and keep the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.40.94 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Reply, It's too late now. I do believe that the article with the refs provided was easily more than borderline keep. This article should never have been deleted. The article itself with the references and coverage that was accessible by Bing, Google and Yahoo, was very notable. This is an example of an article that could have withstood the onslaught of deletion votes if it was set out better and had more solid refs. It saddens me that people put in a lot of work on Wikipedia only to have it destroyed by others. The reasons for this vary, but this isn't the place to discuss this. I hope if this article resurfaces that good solid refs are included. Karl Twist (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2016 (UTC)