Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Anjali Mukerjee (2nd nomination)

Review of sources
In the interest of parsing the massive ref bomb in this article, I'll go through them a few at a time:


 * 1) Pharmaleaders is a biog tossed into a random announcement.
 * 2) IFL is a business announcement
 * 3) Telegraph India is basically an op-ed
 * 4) is a random website which doesn't even support the statement for which it is cited
 * 5) is an event announcement
 * 6) this in no way convinces me it is at all reliable since the author can't even be identified
 * 7) Anyone can be listed on an alumni page. Graduating isn't significant, so while this is just meant to source details of her life, it's irrelevant in establishing notability.
 * 8) same as above
 * 9) a photo gallery
 * 10) not even remotely reliable
 * 11) i'm not going to actually dignify such a ridiculous source with an evaluation
 * 12) another brief opinion piece
 * 13) I'm not really sure what to make of this source as I do not have full access to it but I'm not convinced that mention in a book is all that significant
 * 14) Not sure how we can evaluate a source in a brand new article when it doesn't work, but "nuffoodsspectrum" doesn't appear to be an RS any way.
 * 15) same as 7
 * 16) not an RS
 * 17) non-notable award
 * 18) an interview in a questionable source
 * 19) an op ed with no identifiable author
 * 20) a generic search result
 * 21) this genuinely looks like something a spambot posts on their userpage. Written by the subject.
 * 22) same as above. Written by the subject.
 * 23) written by the subject
 * 24) would love to evaluate this and the one below it however the citation doesn't even give the page number
 * 25) see above
 * 26) written by the subject
 * 27) not an rs and written by subject
 * 28) interview
 * 29) appearance on a non notable show/channel
 * 30) dead link


 * I'd also like to note that several of these sources appeared in older deleted versions at some point and are long dead sites... Praxidicae (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)