Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Anti-Romanian massacres in north Transylvania, 1940-1944

There is a lot of crap on this debate. Would anyone object if I were to remove comments from two obvious trolls, plus a lot of stuff people have said in anger? I would naturally keep all relavent comments in. But this is meant to be a debate about deleting or keeping an article. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 19:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know, if you remove some of the angry comments, you may be accused of trying to erase history...okay, sorry, I won't make comments like that. Anyway, if everyone else agrees I wouldn't have any objection to you striking out the more argumentative/inflammatory/irrelevant comments, just so long as you're careful to leave in all the relevant/on topic information. Calgary 20:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't object to removing any of my replies that you deem irrelevant (I trust your judgment), nor, of course, to removing any/all of the socks' flames. The problem, however, may be that the attacks are intertwined with replies - one user made an allegation about me in his vote message; replies to claims are lesser parts of the more relevant replies (potentially leaving them out of context); references to stuff written at various intervals has made it into relevant reply. If you still think you can sort this out, I have no objection. Dahn 20:37, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Addition: if you need me to move, strike out, or even remove parts of my own comments as a consequence of this measure, I'll comply. Dahn 20:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree to the removal of any of my comments, except for my vote. --KIDB 20:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

OK I'm going to go ahead in stages. Please check what I do and let me know about anything you are unhappy about. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 21:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I do believe you should remove the comment starting with "Why you being Romanian is relevant to this thread?" and my reply to it - they were both in reference to a comment made by "Alfort". Dpotop's diatribe was, IMO, out of line, and it is no longer in connection to anything. Dahn 21:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It was actually in connection to some of John's statements, which I see you have removed as well. There is also Dpotop's comment "What you call a personal attack was a necessary mise-en-garde following Dahn's pathetic 'I am a Romanian, too' ", and my reply to it - both of which are in reference to the deleted text.
 * And, let me add: I would be interested to know if John the Historian and Prâslea are in any way connected to each other and to the sockpuppets (see for example John editing "Gladys"' text). Dahn 21:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I suspect they probably are but wasn't 100% sure. I'll take another look tomorrow (got to go to bed now). I'm finished removing stuff for now. I think I've turned the debate into a civilised one. I'd be grateful if you all could keep it friendly. I do not think I erased anyone's votes or importent on topic points. If I did, i apologise. Please add them back in. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 22:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)