Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Antoine Dodson

STRONG KEEP - I head about this guy and wanted some more information about him. What is the first website I go to, Wikipedia. It's quick and fast and has an article for almost anything you could think of. If Wikipedia had not had an article for this guy I would have been highly disappointed. (MMMK)

The deletion
SCAM. The conclusion was NOT delete. Who is he to say the votes aren't "grounded in policy"?? Mine was! How can this abuse or incompetent use of administrative power be challenged? Rapidosity (talk) 04:15, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Complain about the admin that deleted the article here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_review/King_of_Hearts#.7B.7Badmin.7CKing_of_Hearts.7D.7D Rapidosity (talk) 04:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If you are unhappy with the deletion (and I can understand that you are) you should discuss things with the deleting admin and, if you are still not happy, then raise the matter at WP:Deletion review. See Deletion_policy. It would help your cause to learn up on deletion policy because some of your arguments have tended to support the deletion side of things. Thincat (talk) 09:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

I do not see why this could not be recreated. New reliable sources are popping up, like this story in ''The Guardian only two hours ago. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 01:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Go for it. Rapidosity (talk) 03:49, 15 August 2010 (UTC)