Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Armenia–Portugal relations (2nd nomination)

Moved from discussion page

 * Delete: Article contains one nugget of notable information, which would be better presented on the Foreign relations of Armenia and Foreign relations of Portugal articles. Ryan 4314   (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC) [Note: this !vote remains on the actual AfD page, I've copied it here only to provide context for the comments below Yilloslime T C  17:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC) ]
 * Which means this article's edit history must remain public per the GFDL. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 15:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There are ways around that I gather, articles can't be kept because of some wikilawyering that's been performed. Ryan 4314   (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * They cannot be deleted when no legitimate reasons exists to do so. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 15:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's your opinion, some here differ, some agree. Ryan 4314   (talk) 15:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Subjectively some may disagree with me, but objectively there is no reason/need to delete verifiable content of interest to some readers. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 15:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Subjectively some may disagree with me, but objectively there is reason/need to delete content better hosted on parent articles. Ryan 4314   (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Per WP:PRESERVE that is a call to merge with edit history intact at worst. There is no valid need to protect the public from the edit history of this article.  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:17, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikilawyering per GDFL, this tiny amount of content would be better served on parent articles. Ryan 4314   (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Which is not a reason to redlink. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It is. Ryan 4314   (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Not per our policies, guidelines, and long-standing traditions. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:43, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Being familiar with these, there are none which prohibit deletion. Ryan 4314   (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * While many support inclusion or at worst merging with edit history intact, none actually support deletion. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)