Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Arsenal and Chelsea rivalry statistics


 * Note. This isnt RFA its AFD. The Nom didnt say whether to delete, keep, etc. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * To clarify, I believe that delete is the only option. Qwghlm (talk) 01:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Requests for adminship?!? This is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion; can we not automatically interpret a nomination as delete? PC78 (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, well, no. See, there are alot of editors that nominate an article, just to see what others think. Regards. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Are there?! I would have thought that the title of this page is pretty self explanatory. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 01:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "Articles for deletion (AfD) is where Wikipedians discuss whether an article should be deleted." If editors want to know what others think about an article, they should be using the talk page, not AfD. PC78 (talk) 01:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You appear to be missing the point now, and are argumentative. Address any unresolved issues on my talk page. This is for AFD's. Not descriptive commentary on usages of this page in itself. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 01:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The purpose of AfD is self-explanatory; if some users are using it as WP:RfC, then they shouldn't be. But frankly, I don't see too much of that sort of thing myself. I'm not missing your point, I just don't think it really applies. PC78 (talk) 01:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Look. I said nothing about RFC, and this is getting out of hand, fast. The original statement was support per nom. This is a common comment on RFA. And like I said, not all nominations are for delete. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 01:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I would like to point out that Qwghlm's "delete" comment was removed on accident. Must have been due to the edit conflict. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 01:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Simply because my original comment said Support rather than Delete it does not mean that I got confused between AfD and RfA. The wording of the nomination and the fact that it was listed at AfD clearly indicated the fact that the nominator would like to see the article deleted, so commenting support rather than delete, whilst not as common at AfD, was equally valid. I really don't see how anyone could get AfD and RfA mixed up or what relevance RfA bears on this discussion in the first place. Frankly, I find it quite offensive that you are implying that I am dim enough to get the two pages confused. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 20:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)