Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ateneo De La Salle University

Deletion
By notability are you referring to the site not being well-known enough? Also, the sources I listed are directly from the site itself. Universitylibrarian (talk) 22:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I encourage you to read our generic policy of notability, and also the more specific organizational policies. Also, having "sources" from the organization's website does not fulfill our policy of having reliable third-party sources. "Wikipedia articles should rely primarily on reliable, third-party, published sources..." This article also might fail WP:COI and WP:NPOV. Tan   &#124;   39  22:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have read this beforehand though I didn't know for sure which aspect of notability you were referring to. I have also read the WP org article as well and I know that the site isn't as well known as other sites such as facebook or myspace but it is popular among fellow lasallians and ateneans. Perhaps that isn't a big thing but I only wished to create a wiki for the site for the sole reason of reference and as a sign of accomplishment since we are but a small site with humble beginnings. Advertising the site is not one of my goals at all. I do understand it might fail in the categories of COI and NPOV since I am an actual user of the site. What do you suggest I do then? Universitylibrarian (talk) 22:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I recommend that you understand that organizations do not have a right, or do not inherently deserve, inclusion in Wikipedia. This is also certainly not the place to have a "badge of honor", or a "sign of accomplishment", as you say. As this is most certainly a COI issue at this point - and if you can't point to any reliable, third-party sources at all to show notability - this article will almost assuredly be deleted. I started the AfD discussion, we'll see where it goes. Tan   &#124;   39  22:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand. I'm not saying the organization has a right or deserves to be included in wikipedia. I do know that perhaps I am a bit serious with the project but I've even seen that in the people here who are dedicated to the pages they create. But anyway, I understand why you marked it for deletion. Any other suggestions? Is there any other alternative to place bios for an org without third party sources? We really haven't been mentioned in books or the news. Just locally in schools. Universitylibrarian (talk) 22:52, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I revised the page again. Please check the reception section of the page. Universitylibrarian (talk) 00:16, 15 June 2009 (UTC)