Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Atheism 3.0

Keep
4 delete 3 keep 1 merge

I would add keep.

Previous problem of single sourcing is resolved. That was the sole basis of one of the delete comment.

The influential Burke article is discussed as is Daley's and two or three additional authors.

As far as I know there is no spod cat applicable so let's have some freedom of expression on WP.

Talk first beforehand.

It would be nice to have access to the old article.

Note that Conservepedia, which is highly POV, has its article on the topic why can't Wikipedians have access to an NPOV treatment of the same topic?

Devilishlyhandsome (talk) 01:02, 26 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The article will be deleted. Discussion is closed. Take it up with the closing administrator SilkTork or copy the article into your own namespace by clicking on this link and pasting the article's text: User:Devilishlyhandsome/Atheism 3.0.
 * Cheers - Binksternet (talk) 02:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)