Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response

I've experienced exactly what the writer(s) of the ASMR entry described since I was a small child. Just because it's rare does not make is "pseudo-science". We (ASMR experiencers) are doing our best to stir up interest so that "serious research" can be done. Please, let this stay.

This entry should stay so that someone unfamiliar with the term can at least understand what it refers to. I'm a little unclear about why applying "verifyability" criteria determines whether this article stays or goes. Doesn't Wikipedia have articles on ESP, Dyanetics, religious beliefs, ghosts, etc? The point is to give people an understand of the topic, not to provide validity. The article content can discuss whether or not it's been scientifically vetted. Leeconte (talk) 18:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

As someone who has experienced this since a small child,
I am glad to see the article go. Until the phenomenon has a legitimate name based on anything resembling, you know, real scientific concepts, rather than homeopathic/healing crystal/ley line pseudoscience insanity, I think it is better for it to disappear. Surely there is some other Wikipedia article that could have this phenomenon discussed under it? 97.113.28.76 (talk) 11:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)