Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Avetik Chalabyan

Avetik Chalabyan is a respected figure, who has always been involved in public life of Armenia. He constantly leads discussions on political modernization, economic development, national defense and security of Armenia. Some of his interviews are available at the following links.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0uG1kAEdqU&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6dcsW3WxMc&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3smPlELhZLA&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRdaZBZYPWo&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl3X3f1rew0&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ddq5qaEXYrM&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dx_rIkj3VLA&feature=youtu.be

It is weird to see the demand for the deletion of Avetik Chalabyan's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arag51 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

How Was This Article Deleted?
Hi. How was this article deleted, if there was not concurrence with its deletion? To my understanding, articles are only deleted if everyone concurs. How did the administrator User:Sandstein arrive at the conclusion to Delete this article, if it did not have full agreement on its deletion? It had 3 deletes, 1 keep and 1 ambivalent vote out of 5 votes.

I have not read the article at all, merely the discussion, but it appears that the article and its subject had enough viability for it to continue to be worked on. Most articles on Wikipedia are incomplete and are works in progress... Even the so-called starred articles. Yet, based on the comments here, it seems the article needed more work, not deletion. Many of the naysayers that voted to delete, appear to know nothing about the topic or have an interest in it; whether it was good or bad didn't seem to matter. Should they have been able to cast their vote? Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:40, 8 August 2019 (UTC)