Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Beaglier

L'esprit de l'escalier
We have a dispute about a comment made after this discussion was closed. Here's the timeline:

00:31 17 Dec: DGG closes the discussion. The closing boilerplate states that "Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page."

10:37 17 Dec: William Harris makes an additional comment and follows this with some copy-edits.

18:15 17 Dec: Malcolmxl5 makes two edits to correct the formatting of the close

19:51 17 Dec: Andrew Davidson reverts William Harris's comment, "revert addition to closed discussion"

07:02 18 Dec: William Harris starts an edit war by reverting the revert, "It was not closed when I made the comment. That you find it embarrassing is not my problem."

My concern is is that we maintain an accurate record of the discussion as it was closed as it seems that these articles about dogs are the subject of endless disputation and so we may need to refer back to it. If William Harris wishes to make additional comments, he might do so on this talk page, the talk page of the articles in question or WP:DRV, as appropriate. I might have more to say myself and so it goes. So, please could settle this. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:12, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The comment seems to be quite irrelevant to whether or not the articles are notable or justifiable, & the time stamps make the sequence clear.  I'd tend to leave them be.  DGG ( talk ) 17:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)