Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Belle Delphine

Was editing in my view when the debate was closed. For the record it was this:


 * Delete - On the one hand she has a lot of coverage. Theres no notability standard for media influencers based on reach or followers but there is evidence of enough genuine followership to garner 2 million likes in a very short time. Also enough independent notice for her pornhub trolling to get a load of independent media coverage. Also enough independent notice for her more recent possible trolling (an offer to sell jars of her used bathwater to fans!! Dear god!!) to get a load of independent media coverage. On the other hand, mere follower count doesn't make notability. Take those two calculated self promotional matters away and she's clearly got little else. And those were just self-promo publicity stunts. They might have got attention, but it's a long-standing part of notability that "being famous for being famous", or recognizing a publicity stunt with a Wiki article when the stunt is just a transient passing event of no lasting significance, does not satisfy WP:N or [WP:BLP]]. For me, there is no evidence that she has met our notability criteria except that she has pulled two self promotional media stunts that gained transient coverage only due to their calculatedly attention grabbing design. Hence for me, "Delete NN or at best TOOSOON". If we're still seeing discussion of her or seeing serious media interviews - or really any other signs of non transience or other notability whatsoever - in say 6 months time, we can always revisit. FT2 (Talk 11:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I can't be the only person who found this AFD after searching to find out who the heck this person is. From what I've seen, the result seems justified. Robofish (talk) 20:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)