Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/BetterDoctor

The prior article appears to have been a self-promotional piece penned by an employee. However, after looking into BetterDoctor, it appears to be an important playing in the health technology startup ecosystem.

How does this article different from any of the other web-based health tech company articles which have been permitted to stay? All of them read like press releases: ZocDoc, Vitals_(website), and HealthGrades.

Wiki contrib sf (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

---

In my opinion the article was unbiased and met the notability requirements of wikipedia. Several sources mentioned, even linking within wikipedia was in place.

Jrisku (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2014 (UTC)