Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Bhaskar Mukherjee

The deletion policy of biography of Bhaskar Mukherjee is very ambiguous. If any Spam authority or organization nominate a person for inclusion his/her name for their biographical source how the person become a Spam? A person earned all the prestige in his life and some one else can make him/her a spam by simply sending a letter to him/her!!! What a joke!!! Are the admin are literature or putting their brain without analysing any thing? What a non-sense explanation. I don't know how a people compare and comment on a person who is his field have high repuation, having qualitative articles in so reputed journals like JASIST, Elsiever's Library & Information Science Research, Journal of Academic Librarianship, IFLA Journal, Scientometrics and published book by Chados, UK? I have little doubt about any professional from LIS field in India having such a parallel profile with Bhaskar Mukherjee. There are so many other entries with low profile also available in wiki. I feel the administrator must have some biasness towards the person, due to that he/she commented like this. So it is better to unblock the file to edit and suggest him to delete some of the lines which are not important and upload to wiki. It is highly objectionable to delete a entry without considering the fact. Stop non-sensing for maintaining wiki’ standard. --Open3215 (talk) 09:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Open3215 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)