Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Biker Zombies From Detroit

The person who wants this article deleted mentions:

1. no in-depth reviews

Search google (there are other search engines out there as well) and you will find at least half a dozen reviews and minor ones under both titles it goes under (Biker Zombies, Biker Zombies From Detroit). Check out the IMDB entry as well. The reviews are not rosy but since when has that been a criteria? You can write a bad review about almost all movies that come out these days. I found these results after 5 minutes of searching.

http://www.angelfire.com/film/lookhot/reviewfilms/biker.html http://www.pulpmovies.com/reviews/biker-zombies-from-detroit http://www.rogersvideodirect.ca/Browse/title.aspx?f=titleId(117774) http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/149527/how_to_not_sell_a_movie.html http://www.horror-movies.ca/horror-reviews.php?navletter=B http://www.horror-movies.ca/horror-movie.php?id=3554

The movie has been reviewed in videoscopemag. A well known indy magazine. http://videoscopemag.com/review_index_01.htm

2. the film won no awards

If the criteria for a movie to be mentioned on wikipedia was winning awards we wouldn't have too many movies even mentioned. The movie did go above and beyond most independent films...it actually made it to the Cannes film festival — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arock99 (talk • contribs)


 * A showing at Cannes isn't an award. As for the reviews, they are all internet reviews. None are reliable sources. IrishGuy talk 10:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Video Scope Mag is a reliable published source. How many published sources are required?

My point about Cannes Film Festival is not that it makes it win an award. Actually my argument was that if that was a criteria for movies in general to make it on Wikipedia there would hardly be any to begin with. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arock99 (talk • contribs) 12:52, August 29, 2007 (UTC)