Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Bismil Azimabadi (2nd nomination)

I think, you should revert self. Non-admin closure of this afd has been contested, therefore it would probably be in best interest to let it remain open and wait for an administrator to assess consensus. You are free to disagree, but that is my opinion and I believe is shared by at least two other editors. And it should be noted that WP:NAC is an essay not a policy or guideline (WP:BADNAC might have some relevance here). Anup  [Talk]  10:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Na, if they wish to contest a valid closure they can take it to DRV. I understand your position, however the relevant policy page would be WP:Consensus with WP:Close as an information followup. Which would be less restrictive than WP:NAC anyway. If there was less 'Only an admin can do this!' about things which do not require admins, the same editors who complain that 'there are not enough admins!' would get a little quieter. Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:17, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I meant to cite only last para of wp:badnac. Anup   [Talk]  10:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I am of course, not going to point out the silliness of citing an essay to rebut another essay ;) Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:23, 5 October 2016 (UTC)