Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Boba Phat (2nd nomination)


 * Comment I fail to see how this being my first action as a member can be used to call the move's validity into question. The article clearly does not meet several standards as laid out in the WP:NOTE guidelines.Biohazard388 (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't care if you see, though there's no way this is your first edit on wikipedia. Its simply information some editors like to know to consider if the voting is askew. Perhaps others will not care.--Milowent (talk) 17:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Another account created just to vote delete?--Milowent (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Perhaps multiple persons can reach a similar conclusion based on the data available? Check IP Addresses if proof is needed.Biohazard388 (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * So what you're trying to say is that because I've made no other contributions, I'm not intelligent enough to know that his article is clearly a mockery? Of the so called 'sources' that aren't youtube videos, he's barely mentioned. Most of the 'sources' have absolutely nothing to do with him, save for a single instance in which he has one whole paragraph. And, as Biohazard pointed out, you should take the time to find proof before making baseless accusations.Rogueslade (talk) 22:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Holy sockapalooza. Would you at least try varying your diction?--Milowent (talk) 23:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You do realize you're going to look like an idiot when they perform an investigation that shows that we're separate individuals, right? And, you also realize diction actually means method of pronunciation? It has nothing to do with the way someone writes. As it stands, would you perhaps prefer folk use improper grammar and add in a few spelling mistakes? Rogueslade (talk) 23:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Diction: "style of speaking or writing as dependent upon choice of words": good diction. The only thing idiotic is leaving the comments above without explanation of their source and in context, but I guess I'll survive.--Milowent (talk) 01:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)